AP Editor, Julie Pace, Says Government Retaliation Threatens Public Access To Information
The Associated Press is now at the center of an unprecedented First Amendment clash with the White House after being barred from Oval Office events and key presidential activities earlier this year for refusing to adopt the administration’s directive renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America.”
AP argues the exclusion was retaliation for an editorial decision protected by press freedom, and a federal judge agreed in April, ordering the White House to restore full access.
But compliance has been uneven, and the fight has since grown into a broader legal battle over whether the government can punish a news organization for the language it uses.
Here’s what the AP editor wrote:
The Associated Press is back in a courtroom Monday defending itself and our principles against the White House, continuing to fight for the right of the press and public to speak freely without being targeted by their government based on its preferences.
This is not a controversial idea. Yet this foundational American freedom remains under threat.
It’s why AP took a stand nine months ago when the government blocked us from covering presidential events because of what we call a body of water. We strongly believe this case could have much wider implications, not only for other news organizations, but for anyone in America.
Those ripples are becoming more evident since we first took this case to court.
In the last few months, we have seen the White House take legal action against other news organizations; the Pentagon require reporters to agree to a new press policy incompatible with journalistic standards; and journalists from other outlets restricted from covering the White House over what they’ve written.
All this makes it as important as it has ever been to be clear about the role of the press in a democracy and what exactly is at stake.
When we talk about press freedom, we are really talking about your freedom. Reporters ask questions, photographers take pictures, and video journalists record history on your behalf to ensure that you are informed about the things you don’t have the time to unearth, watch or learn about for yourself.
Letting the government control which journalists can cover the highest office in the land and setting rules about what those journalists can say or write is a direct attempt to undercut the First Amendment. It should worry all of us. Because if a president of any party can use personal and political preference to choose which journalists to allow in – and kick others out because of the words they use – it means you are not getting a full picture of what is happening. It results in a filtered look at whoever holds the highest office, not the rigorous coverage the public deserves.
Independent, accurate, factual journalism is essential to civil society. AP journalists contribute to this every day. We bear witness, ask hard questions and document history as it unfolds, on behalf of the public. We always strive to get it right – and to own up to mistakes when we make them. We don’t advocate or take a side. Our mission is to report the facts, plain and simple, so you can decide. That’s it.
When fundamental freedoms are at stake, however, it becomes our duty, as an independent, not-for-profit news organization, with no owner and no shareholders, to stand up. On behalf of all of us.
Because, after all, AP’s freedom of speech is yours, too.
