Community Voices Split as Props a and B Move Forward with Redevelopment Plans
With the results of the November election, regarding Propositions A and B, voters have spoken approving both props. Proposition A received 60% of the vote and Proposition B received 55% of the vote. Proposition A received 60% of the vote. Both supporters and opponents were very active in voicing their support, as well their concerns and oppositions.
For starters, Proposition A will entail a “Year Round Rodeo District”, after not receiving much organized opposition. Supporters appeared to be supportive of the infusion of new investments, to the Frost Bank Center, as well as to the Freeman Coliseum, as opposed to allowing it to fall into disuse. Those plans reportedly include 4-H activities, fairs, concerts etc., to hopefully help with the much needed revitalization of the Eastside. Neighbors and neighborhood associations will likely present themselves as being deserving of consideration, as the area moves toward changes that will drive economic development.
With Proposition B, supporting organizations, in the form of PACS took to advertising, via mail, flyers, public events, and more, to stress the ‘value’ of the project, particularly, its role in “revitalizing downtown.” The proposed Entertainment and Sports District, dubbed Project Marvel, will involve building a new Spurs Arena, expanding convention space, as well as additional development around the Tower of the Americas. The November vote allows for an increase in the rate for Hotel Occupancy tax as well as an increase in the taxes on car rentals.
Opponents of Proposition B were quite visible,with COPS/Metro advocating that “public funds should serve public needs”, particularly in the areas of flood control, affordable housing, infrastructure, in addition to the City’s customary public works. Others expressed opposition that this “was a misguided public subsidy which benefits wealthy owners.” One specific group No! Project Marvel, created its own signs, met regularly and made sure voters were aware of their opposition to this project. The San Antonio Observer kept its message clear throughout ‘Vote No’. These oppositions were heeding history as this is their 4th ‘rodeo’ with the Spurs.
Moving forward, it appears that voters, concerned citizens, and members of the various neighborhood associations, who will be impacted, by the development and must become organized for the purpose of identifying the shared benefits that should come to the Eastside, especially to Downtown, Lavaca, Denver Heights and Dignowity Hill, all of whom are closest to the new development.
Let’s collectively keep our eyes open.
