(AP)– President Donald Trump’s top advisers and Nayib Bukele, the president of El Salvador, said Monday that they had no basis for the small Central American nation to return Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was wrongly deported there last month.
Trump administration officials emphasized that Abrego Garcia, who was sent to a notorious gang prison in El Salvador, was a citizen of that country and that the U.S. has no say in his future. And Bukele, who has been a vital partner for the Trump administration in its deportation efforts, said he does not “have the power to return him to the United States.”
The Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration must “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s return.
I’m a dietitian on a budget, which means I get pretty strategic when it comes to buying healthy foods at a low price point. Even though I love to cook, I still get takeout on the regular, at least a few times a month. And sometimes, that takeout happens to be fast food—yes, dietitians eat fast food, too! And one chain that will always have a special place in my heart is Wendy’s.
Growing up, my mom and I would always run errands together. Whether it was a trip to our beloved Costco or a stroll around the local mall, it was a special time for just the girls of the family to be together (my dad and brothers were not invited—sorry, guys). To cap off these shopping sprees, we would grab a quick lunch somewhere. That varied a lot and depended on where we were shopping, but Wendy’s was a regular in the rotation for one reason: We both love (with a capital L) their baked potatoes. That’s right, if you didn’t already know, Wendy’s sells whole baked potatoes at many of their locations.
Here is the nutrition information for the potato options on the Wendy’s menu:
Sour Cream & Chive Baked Potato
310 calories
2.5g fat
1.5g saturated fat
10mg cholesterol
55mg sodium
63g carbs
7g fiber
8g protein
Bacon Cheese Baked Potato
440 calories
13g fat
6g saturated fat
35mg cholesterol
600mg sodium
64g carbs
7g fiber
17g protein
There are several reasons why the humble spud from this chain has my heart, beyond the nostalgia factor. As far as meals at fast food chains go, it’s pretty rare you can get a whole fresh vegetable cooked as is. Plus, potatoes are packed with good-for-you nutrients like fiber, potassium and vitamin C, to name a few. The Bacon Cheese potato has significantly more sodium and saturated fat than the Sour Cream & Chive potato. So if you’re trying to follow a heart-healthy eating pattern, it may be a better idea to opt for the Sour Cream & Chive option or stick to plain and ask for toppings on the side.
You can also customize your toppings based on your preferences. Their menu items include Sour Cream & Chive or Bacon & Cheese topping options, but if you like to live on the wild side like me, you can ask for sour cream, chives and bacon (you can thank me later). Oh, and a delectable plain baked potato clocks in at 270 calories and $1.99 (price may vary depending on your location).
In an effort to keep this menu item on their menu eternally, I urge you to try the baked potato next time you stop at Wendy’s. Whether you’re on a road trip or just need a quick, healthy and affordable lunch in a pinch, this healthy fast food meal has you covered.
Jasmine Crockett, A Rising Power in the Democratic Party, Isn’t Backing Down To MAGA
Since stepping into Congress in 2023, Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) has made it clear—she didn’t come to play nice with politicians who thrive on chaos and double standards. Her direct style, unapologetic tone, and bold critiques have placed her front and center in the Democratic Party, quickly earning her both loyal supporters and predictable attacks from the conservative echo chamber. While Crockett is simply using the same political fire Republicans have long mastered, right-wing outlets like Fox News twist her words and weaponize her identity to discredit her.
Conservative Media Can Dish It, But Can’t Take It
It’s not lost on anyone paying attention that media platforms like Fox News run full segments on Crockett every time she claps back at MAGA rhetoric. From calling Trump a “mofo” to dragging Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s migrant busing stunts, Crockett uses the same mocking, cutting style Republicans have perfected for years. But when it comes from a Black woman, suddenly it’s “radical,” “offensive,” or “crossing the line.”
Take her “Governor Hot Wheels” comment, for example. Fox News immediately spun it as an attack on Abbott’s disability. Crockett clarified that the jab wasn’t about Abbott being paralyzed—it was about his cruel, performative immigration policies. “Literally, the next line I said was that he was a ‘hot a– mess,’ referencing his terrible policies,” she explained. “So I’m even more appalled that the very people who unequivocally support Trump—a man known for racially insensitive nicknames and mocking those with disabilities—are now outraged.”
It’s clear: When MAGA-world engages in name-calling, it’s “just politics.” But when Crockett responds in kind, they cry foul.
She’s Not the Problem—She’s the Reaction
Jasmine Crockett’s entire style is a direct response to what the GOP has normalized. She’s not inventing the game—she’s just refusing to lose at it. Her critics can’t handle seeing their own tactics turned back at them, especially by someone who doesn’t fit their idea of who should have a voice in Congress.
In a recent Fox News piece, Crockett was slammed for saying America “needs” undocumented immigrants because “we done picking cotton.” It was a purposely decontextualized quote meant to outrage the GOP base. But her point was crystal clear: America has relied on the labor of marginalized groups for centuries, and now conservatives are demonizing the very people who keep the economy running. If her delivery cuts deep, maybe it’s because the truth hits too hard for comfort.
Trump’s Mental Fitness: A Topic Everyone’s Scared to Touch—Except Her
Crockett has also been one of the few elected officials bold enough to publicly question Donald Trump’s mental stability. While Trump boasts about acing a cognitive test (“I got every answer right”), Crockett has called out the glaring hypocrisy of Republicans mocking President Biden’s age while turning a blind eye to Trump’s erratic behavior.
“The fact that no one is questioning his mental acuity or fitness to serve is beyond wild to me,” she told MSNBC. Comparing life under Trump to an “abusive relationship,” Crockett didn’t hold back: “At least with Sleepy Joe, you could sleep at night.”
Fox News Isn’t Reporting—They’re Defending a Narrative
While right-wing media continues to police her tone, Crockett remains focused on the policies and people they ignore—Black communities, immigrants, working families, and anyone fed up with political gaslighting disguised as governance.
They’ve branded her as “left-wing” and “radical,” but what she really is, is real. And the more they try to silence her, the louder her message becomes.
Small Businesses and Collectors Brace Themselves As Tariffs Push Sneaker Prices Up, Small Brands Down
Devlin Carter, the founder of luxury sneaker brand SIA Collective, built his company from the ground up. In just six years, he turned it into a multimillion-dollar success by delivering fashion-forward, high-quality sneakers—most made in China. But now, Trump’s sweeping tariffs on imports are threatening everything he’s built.
“These are ridiculous tariffs that make no sense,” Carter said. “Small businesses like mine have to pay these tariffs, and it’s not a small thing. It’s a lot.”
Sneaker Prices Soar as Global Production Takes a Hit
The $70 billion sneaker industry is bracing for impact. With the majority of sneakers produced overseas—especially in China, Vietnam, and Taiwan—the tariffs have made importing shoes to the U.S. significantly more expensive.
Carter breaks it down: “Say I pay $100 to have a pair of shoes made in China. With the tariffs, that shoe now costs $150 or more [to make]. And it shouldn’t. It’s unnecessary.”
Even global giants like Nike are caught in the fallout. With a 46% tariff on goods from Vietnam and 32% from Taiwan, the company would lose even more trying to move production to the U.S., according to economist Peter Schiff. “The result will be fewer sneakers sold in the U.S. at much higher prices,” he warned.
Trump Brushes Off Public Concern
When asked about the pain these tariffs may cause Americans, Trump dismissed the question entirely:
“I think your question is so stupid,” he said. “I don’t want anything to go down. But sometimes you have to take medicine to fix something.”
Carter doesn’t see it that way. “There’s consumer fear out there,” he said. “You feel like your job is shaky and the economy is shaky, your way of life is shaky, you go into survival mode. And in survival mode, most people don’t spend.”
Collectors and Resellers Say It’s Not Just Business—It’s Personal
Earl West, a self-proclaimed sneakerhead with over 1,800 pairs stored at home, says the tariffs are changing everything. “That pair of $180 sneakers is going to cost me $250 now,” he said. “So I have to be very selective… I can’t afford to spend $250 on a pair every other week.”
West also said that buying internationally is no longer worth it. “Instead of $60 to ship it to me, it’s going to cost me $120 — plus the cost of the shoe. And that’s just too much.”
Resellers are feeling the pinch, too. “You have to buy a $150 shoe at a higher rate than it’s worth. And then you have to sell it even higher to make money. That’s going to be a problem,” West said.
Sneaker Entrepreneurs Sound the Alarm
Before the tariffs, Carter was able to move over $2 million worth of sneakers. Now, he’s stuck navigating a disrupted supply chain and increased costs, all while trying to keep his prices reasonable. But like many in the industry, he worries the damage is already done.
“People buy my shoes because they like them,” he said, “but it’s a luxury item. And when people feel like their world is uncertain, they stop buying luxuries. That’s bad for us. That’s bad for everybody.”
Outrage Builds as Video Shows Idaho Police Shooting An Autistic Teenager
Seventeen-year-old Victor Perez was autistic, nonverbal, and lived with cerebral palsy. None of that mattered when Pocatello, Idaho police arrived and opened fire on him through a chain-link fence. Victor, who had been holding a kitchen knife during a mental health episode, died Saturday after being removed from life support. He had undergone multiple surgeries, had nine bullets removed from his body, and had one of his legs amputated before doctors confirmed he no longer had brain activity.
Police claimed they were responding to a 911 call reporting a man with a knife who was “chasing” someone. In reality, Victor wasn’t intoxicated or aggressive—he walked with an uneven gait because of his condition. His family had already been trying to calm him down when officers arrived. But instead of pausing to assess the situation or ask a single question, four officers rushed the scene, shouted at Victor to drop the knife, and shot him within 12 seconds of exiting their vehicles.
Shot Through a Fence—Before Anyone Could Explain
A neighbor’s video shows Victor already on the ground after stumbling, still holding the knife, when police arrived. According to his aunt, Ana Vazquez, he tried to get up and stumbled forward, prompting officers to open fire. “Those four officers didn’t care,” Vazquez said. “They didn’t ask what was happening, what was the situation.” She added, “How’s he going to jump the fence when he can barely walk?”
The officers’ names have not been released, but they’ve been placed on administrative leave while the Eastern Idaho Critical Incident Team conducts an investigation. The Bannock County Prosecutor says the case will be reviewed by an agency outside the county for transparency. But transparency alone won’t bring Victor back—or undo the damage caused to his family and community.
A Community in Mourning, a Family Shattered
Victor’s death sparked outrage in Pocatello. About 200 people gathered for a vigil outside the hospital, while another protest formed outside City Hall, which also houses the police department. Snipers were reportedly stationed on nearby rooftops during the peaceful demonstration. Protesters held signs like “Do better, PPD” and “Justice for Victor” while passing cars honked in support.
“Those police broke our family,” Vazquez said after Victor’s death. “There is no way to explain the pain that we are feeling right now. It’s like our hearts are kind of empty—it’s not full anymore.”
Mayor Brian Blad issued a generic statement offering “thoughts and prayers” and emphasized that investigations are ongoing. But to many, the city’s response has been more about optics than justice.
Victor Was a Son, a Nephew, and a Soul Full of Joy
Victor wasn’t a threat—he was a teenager who loved pro wrestling, French fries, and holding his mother’s hand on walks. He noticed when his aunt painted her nails blue, his favorite color, and liked touching her new hairstyles. “I’m going to miss him when he used to get in his weird moods,” Vazquez said. “I used to put him to bed… I would promise him, ‘Hey, I’ll be back tomorrow but you need to lay down and sleep.’”
Her family doesn’t know what’s next beyond an autopsy scheduled for Monday. For now, they are simply trying to breathe, to rest, and to hold on to whatever pieces of Victor they still can.
America’s Modern Policing: Shoot First, Ask Never
Victor’s story isn’t rare—but it should be. In a country where police are trained to shoot before understanding, not even disability grants you mercy. No time was given. No questions were asked. A teenage boy with a kitchen knife—on his own side of a fence—was met with fatal force because he didn’t comply fast enough. Because he couldn’t.
This is the reality. Police don’t de-escalate. They execute. And when it’s done, they call it “procedure.” But for Victor Perez, there’s no policy that makes this right.
Judge Says Khalil Can Be Deported on “Foreign Policy Grounds”
An immigration judge in Louisiana ruled Friday that Mahmoud Khalil, a graduate student at Columbia University and pro-Palestinian activist, is eligible for deportation under a national security statute. The judge, Jamee E. Comans, said the U.S. government had provided “clear and convincing evidence” that Khalil’s presence could lead to serious foreign policy consequences, satisfying the legal standard for removal.
Legal Team Plans to Appeal, Cites Free Speech Violations
Despite Friday’s ruling, Khalil’s attorneys say the case is far from over. Lawyer Marc Van Der Hout said they plan to appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals and may also file an asylum claim. The judge gave the defense until April 23 to seek a waiver.
Van Der Hout didn’t hold back, calling the hearing a “charade of due process.” “Today, we saw our worst fears play out,” he said. “This is a weaponization of immigration law to suppress dissent.”
Khalil himself challenged the fairness of the proceedings. “Clearly what we witnessed today, neither due process rights nor fundamental fairness were present,” he said in court.
Arrest and Policy Backlash
The State Department, under Secretary Marco Rubio, is using a rarely invoked legal provision that permits deportation of noncitizens who pose “potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences” to the U.S.
Khalil has not been accused of committing any crimes. The government, however, claims his participation in pro-Palestinian demonstrations at Columbia amounts to expressing antisemitic or pro-Hamas views, which it cites as justification for deportation under Trump’s new policy.
Khalil, 30, served as a spokesperson and negotiator for students protesting Israel’s military actions in Gaza. Last spring, the group took over a lawn on Columbia’s campus to draw attention to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
A Dangerous Precedent?
Critics argue Khalil’s arrest and pending deportation are part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to criminalize campus dissent and punish free speech.
Van Der Hout maintains that the real issue is First Amendment rights. “The government’s own submissions prove this has nothing to do with foreign policy,” he said. “This is about silencing voices they disagree with.”
For now, Khalil remains detained in Louisiana, awaiting the next steps in what may become a landmark case testing the limits of protest rights under U.S. immigration law.
Trump Fails to Toss Defamation Case Filed by Exonerated Central Park Five
A federal judge has denied President Donald Trump’s attempt to dismiss a defamation lawsuit brought by the men formerly known as the Central Park Five, clearing the way for the case to move forward. The five men—Yusef Salaam, Antron McCray, Kevin Richardson, Raymond Santana, and Korey Wise—were wrongfully convicted in 1989 and exonerated in 2002 after another man confessed to the brutal rape of a jogger in New York’s Central Park.
U.S. District Judge Wendy Beetlestone issued the ruling Thursday night, rejecting Trump’s motion to dismiss the case in full, though she did toss one claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress.
The Debate Moment That Sparked the Suit
The lawsuit stems from Trump’s remarks during the Sept. 10 presidential debate in Philadelphia against then-Vice President Kamala Harris. When Harris brought up the Central Park Five case, Trump responded with several falsehoods:
“They admitted, they said, they pled guilty… they badly hurt a person, killed a person ultimately.”
But none of that was true. The five men never pled guilty, were convicted at trial, and no victim died. Trump had originally taken out a full-page ad in 1989 calling for the death penalty’s return, a move widely interpreted as a push to execute the teenage suspects.
Plaintiffs Say Trump Knew the Truth and Lied Anyway
The men filed the defamation suit last fall, during Trump’s presidential campaign, arguing that he knowingly spread false and defamatory statements to mislead the public and discredit their exoneration.
“We are gratified by the Court’s ruling and thorough analysis and look forward to discovery, trial, and the ultimate vindication of these five fine men.” Their lawyer, Shanin Specter, said.
The suit seeks compensatory and punitive damages, alleging Trump acted with intent to cause emotional harm and maintain a narrative that paints the men as guilty.
Trump’s Defense Falls Short
Trump’s legal team argued the former president was speaking on a “matter of public concern” and should be immune from civil liability under Pennsylvania law. They also claimed his comments were “substantially true” and reflected his thinking back in 1989.
But Judge Beetlestone disagreed, saying the case could proceed to discovery and trial.
A spokesperson for Trump’s campaign previously dismissed the lawsuit as a “frivolous election interference” effort. Trump’s legal team has yet to comment on the ruling.
A New Chapter in a Long Fight for Justice
The five men were teenagers when they were swept up in the racially charged 1989 case. After years in prison, their convictions were vacated in 2002 when DNA evidence and a confession from another man proved their innocence.
As Specter said at the time of filing, “Trump defamed them in front of 67 million people. Now they’re seeking to clear their names all over again.”
Mattel Unveiled The LeBron Ken Doll Wednesday To Kick If Its “Kenbassador” Series
LeBron James just made history again—this time, off the court. On Wednesday, Mattel unveiled the first-ever Ken doll modeled after a professional male athlete, and none other than the NBA icon himself is leading the charge. Dubbed the “LeBron James Kenbassador Doll,” this release kicks off Mattel’s new “Kenbassador” series, spotlighting influential male role models.
This follows last year’s rollout of nine female athlete Barbies, including tennis legend Venus Williams.
LeBron James holds the doll modeled after him Tuesday. Mattel / Cover Images / AP
A Sports Icon Reimagined in Plastic
“For me, growing up, having role models who inspired me showed me what was possible,” James said. “Now I understand how important it is for kids to see themselves in the people they look up to.”
LeBron, who has spent decades inspiring on and off the court, called the opportunity “an honor” and emphasized the power of positive figures who “instill confidence, inspire dreams, and show kids they can achieve greatness.”
From Akron to Aisles: LeBron’s Doll Details
The LeBron Ken doll comes dripped in a blue-and-white varsity jacket emblazoned with “LJ” on the chest, the number 23 on the sleeve, and “Just a Kid from Akron” across the back. The doll sports sunglasses, headphones, Nike sneakers, and a T-shirt that reads “We Are Family”—a tribute to the LeBron James Family Foundation. The finishing touch? An “I Promise” wristband and a fanny pack that James personally adjusted when he saw the doll for the first time.
In a reaction video, LeBron beamed with pride, repeatedly calling the doll “dope.” With a laugh, he added, “He might need to do a little lifting. Legs look a little skinny. Little fraily little fellow. Nah, that’s dope.”
A Ken for a New Generation
Mattel’s senior VP Krista Berger explained the deeper meaning behind the release: “We are excited to bring fans a new presentation of Ken that celebrates LeBron as a role model, his icon status, lasting impact on culture, and dedication to setting a positive example for the next generation to reach their limitless potential.”
The LeBron Ken doll hits shelves Monday with a retail price of $75. And yes—he wears Nikes.
Trump Administration Strips Visas from Dozens of Texas Students Without Explanation
A wave of confusion and fear has swept across Texas campuses as the Trump administration reportedly revoked visas from dozens of international students without clear justification, leaving them at risk of deportation and unable to complete their studies.
The issue first surfaced at Texas A&M University, where 15 international students were quietly stripped of their student visas. Since then, students at the University of Texas at Dallas, University of North Texas, Texas Woman’s University, Texas Tech, University of Houston, and University of Texas–Rio Grande Valley have reportedly faced the same fate. In total, dozens of students have been affected.
Despite the serious consequences—detention, deportation, and sudden disruption of educational careers—no specific explanations have been provided. University officials and immigration attorneys say they have been left in the dark. Vague justifications range from alleged protest involvement to minor infractions like traffic tickets, but none have been substantiated or tied to any dangerous behavior.
Texas Democratic Party Chairman Kendall Scudder condemned the move in a statement:
“Like everything the Trump administration does, these actions taken against Texas students appear to have come without justification, rationale, or good sense. Whether this crackdown stems from his prejudice against immigrants or his disdain for the First Amendment, either are unacceptable. It’s more recklessness, more chaos, and more instability – the name of the game for Donald Trump and his whole party right now.”
Rohit Shajan, President of the Texas College Democrats, echoed the sentiment:
“Universities all over the world accept international students, with many of the best and brightest bringing their knowledge and expertise to the United States. These students went through the process of obtaining their visas, and deserve to obtain an education just like the American students at universities abroad.”
The situation raises concerns not only about the integrity of international education in the U.S. but also about civil liberties and the ongoing hostility toward immigrants. For now, the students affected remain caught in limbo, awaiting answers that have yet to come.
How Your ‘Beloved’ Former County Judge Nelson Wolff and His Rich Friends Profited from Covid-19 To Boost Their Business
A court case in Texas confirms what many already believe: the system is rigged. It shows how political connections meant to help the public are being used to make the rich even richer.
During COVID-19, public money and health resources were funneled to wealthy donors and nonprofit boards filled with millionaires—leaving minority communities with the worst access and highest death rates.
This lawsuit highlights a bigger issue across Texas and the nation: the powerful using money and influence to silence small businesses and everyday people. It’s not just corruption—it’s about control, greed.
What’s Happening in the Courts?
Houston-based MRG Medical is suing the Texas Tribune and ProPublica over an article they say misled readers and harmed their business. The article suggested a conflict of interest between MRG and Commissioner Tommy Calvert during COVID-19 testing contracts. MRG argues the article falsely implied financial misconduct, even though Calvert served on an unpaid advisory board.
The reporters mentioned Calvert attending dinners and the Kentucky Derby with MRG’s CEO, but left out that he showed proof he paid for his own travel and meals.
According to court documents, the 353rd District Court judge noted, “People are free to go on trips with contractors,” and questioned the article’s relevance after reporters had been shown proof that Calvert paid his own way, stating, “It wasn’t illegal for him to go to the Kentucky Derby if… he paid his entire trip himself.”
LEFT: Court Document: Plaintiff’s Response to Media Defendants Motion to Dismiss. Exhibit 6: Texas Tribune Donation List. Pg 141 | RIGHT: Nelson Wolff, Graham Weston, Bruce Bugg Jr., and J. Tullos Wells, and their respective involvement.
Court documents say the Tribune and ProPublica admitted to “willful and intentional interference” (also known as conspiracy) against MRG Medical, allegedly to protect wealthy donors from testifying. While a District Court ruled MRG had enough evidence to proceed, an appeals court dismissed the case. Now, it’s headed to the Texas Supreme Court, where MRG is seeking a full review to defend small businesses from unfair treatment by powerful media and political forces.
Keeping Up with Transparency: The Big Bad Wolff
This lawsuit reveals a web of financial ties between the Texas Tribune, Community Labs, the Tobin Foundation, and the Tobin Endowment—groups that allegedly gained from the fallout of a 2020 article.
At the center is former Bexar County Judge Nelson Wolff, accused of orchestrating a scheme to divert millions in COVID-19 public funds to Community Labs, a politically connected nonprofit. The suit claims Wolff used his emergency authority during the pandemic to steer taxpayer money to Community Labs—just days after damaging media coverage targeted its competitor, MRG Medical.
Court Document Original Petition. Pg 5
However, Community Labs wasn’t just any vendor. It was co-founded by Bruce Bugg, Chairman of the Tobin Endowment and the founding chair of the Tobin Center’s Board.
Court Document Original Petition. Pg 11.
Court records show the Tobin Foundation donated $1.5 million to the Texas Tribune, and its current and former leaders who also co-founded Community Labs.
Court Document: Plaintiff’s Response to Media Defendants Motion to Dismiss. Pg 9
Other co-founders include J. Tullos Wells and Graham Weston—both Tobin board members. Weston, who co-founded the San Antonio Report (not a defendant), republished the Tribune article featuring Calvert’s photo. This story was broadcasted out by nonprofit news outlets—Texas Tribune, ProPublica, and the San Antonio Report—all generously backed by wealthy elite donors where their profit donations are tax write-offs.
Court Document: Plaintiff’s Response to Media Defendants Motion to Dismiss. Exhibit 7: San Antonio Report’s Re-Publishing of The Story. Pg 154
The media’s role is key. Less than two weeks after the article ran, Wolff and the Bexar County Commissioners Court awarded Community Labs $2 million in COVID testing contracts—later totaling over $4 million.
MRG says this wasn’t a coincidence, but a coordinated effort where political connections, nonprofit money, and media influence came together to benefit insiders and push out independent providers. Today, Nelson Wolff, according to theTobin Center’s website, serves as co-chair of its Advisory Board—still connected to the same circles.
Context of the Big Bad Wolff
We’ve long reported on Nelson Wolff’s track record of failures and questionable actions that have hurt—not helped—the community he claims to serve. For years, Wolff and his wife have used public projects like “BiblioTech” or historic restorations as symbolic gestures to distract from the real harm happening behind the scenes.
In 2014, The San Antonio Observer called out Wolff for ignoring a qualified Black candidate for County Commissioner—a seat Tommy Calvert ultimately won, becoming the youngest and first African-American Commissioner in Bexar County. In 2018, we exposed Wolff’s long pattern of excluding Black leadership from public institutions. And in 2022, we reported on his political negligence in election oversight, including his failure to hold Elections Administrator Jacquelyn Callanen accountable after she defied a judge’s order—disenfranchising voters, especially voters of color.
It’s time the community stops giving him a pass. It’s time for all local media to be transparent and unbiased. And it’s time to move on from politicians like Nelson Wolff, who use public service to enrich themselves, their families, and their inner circle.
Holding Our Politicians Accountable
Though Nelson Wolff is now “retired,” his influence still looms—through nonprofit boards and public tributes. Statues of Wolff and his wife, Tracy, stand at San Pedro Creek Culture Park, honoring their ‘legacy.’ But for many still fighting for equity, transparency, and accountability, that legacy deserves a closer look.
In a time when trust in journalism and government is fading—thanks to rising corruption, bias, and backroom deals (such as this case)—this Texas Supreme Court case goes beyond a dispute between politicians and businesses. It’s about the systemic suppression of voices that dare to challenge them.
We must hold our peers, our politicians, and the media accountable—not only to preserve journalistic integrity, but to protect and uphold the rest of the good democracy has to offer.
