74.2 F
San Antonio
Saturday, April 26, 2025
HEB
Home Blog Page 5

Champagne Brand Commits to Social Impact

From Wedding Planner to Wine Trailblazer: How Samantha Danielle Dockery Is Popping Bottles With Purpose

Samantha Danielle Dockery used to plan weddings, so she knows firsthand how important a good glass of bubbly is when people come together to celebrate love. But she also saw a gap—there weren’t many sparkling wine options made with weddings and meaningful moments in mind. So, she took matters into her own hands.

In May 2023, Samantha launched LOVELUVV™, a sparkling wine brand created to celebrate love stories, hard work, milestones, and everyday joy. Her mission wasn’t just about wine—it was about turning celebration into something deeper. She had earned her Master of Champagne certification back in 2021, and she put that knowledge to work crafting wine sets that made sense for people: easy to personalize and enjoyable for all kinds of palates.

But Samantha didn’t stop there. She made a bold promise: 10% of all profits would go to help individuals and families affected by domestic abuse. That wasn’t a marketing move—it came from personal experience. She wanted every glass of LOVELUVV™ to be more than just a toast. “Enjoying a glass of champagne” became, in her words, “an act of solidarity and support.”

Her first wine? LOVELUVV™ Premier Cru Blanc de Blancs, straight from the Champagne region in France. It quickly became a hit at weddings, family gatherings, and celebrations—anywhere people wanted to share joy. Because to Samantha, champagne isn’t just a drink. It’s a symbol of joy, resilience, and hope.

She’s also using her brand to push for change. As a Black woman in the wine industry, Samantha is breaking barriers and creating space for others. With every bottle sold, she hopes to inspire women of color to go after their dreams—even in industries where they’re often overlooked.

LOVELUVV™ is now expanding with Prosecco Superiore DOCG and Prosecco Rosé, with fresh green apple and soft strawberry notes—made to elevate any moment.

Samantha’s journey shows what happens when passion meets purpose. LOVELUVV™ isn’t just a wine brand—it’s a movement. It’s a reminder that love, healing, and celebration can live in the same glass.

To learn more or order a bottle, visit: https://loveluvvsparkling.wine.

From 22 to 34 Wins: Spurs Show Growth

Spurs Close Season with Comeback Win, Signs of Growth

The Spurs defeated the Toronto Raptors Sunday 125-118 at the Frost Bank Center to close out the 2024-25 season.

Keldon Johnson had 23 points, Stephon Castle added 20, and the Silver and Black rallied from a 22-point third quarter deficit to beat the Raptors.

Harrison Barnes had 18 points and Chris Paul chipped in 15 for the Silver and Black. Barnes and Paul along with Julian Champagnie were the only Spurs who played every game this season.

Rookie guard Stephon Castle, a leading contender for Rookie of the Year, added eight rebounds and six assists to finish out his rookie year.

While the team fell short of a playoff spot the season was not a wash from a standpoint of improvement. At 34-48 the Spurs won twelve more games than in each of the last two seasons which saw the team post a 22-60 record both seasons.

I predicted prior to the season that the team would win 40 games, and would contend for a play-in tournament spot in this year’s playoffs. When you look at this year’s Western Conference playoff seedings, a 40 win season gives the Spurs at least a nine seed. The team seemed on its way especially after acquiring De’Aaron Fox before the trade deadline, however, VDub’s DVT diagnosis put the kibosh on those hopes.

The Spurs were 13-23 this season without their phenomenal sophomore.

All-in-all the season could’ve been worse but it is my opinion that the team did make progress with their rebuild process. In the upcoming week’s we’ll take a look at what the team should do going into year #3 of the VDub era.

Bexar County’s Sgt. Gloria Lewis Honored as Law Enforcement Officer of the Year

American Legion’s 20th District Hosts Annual Spring Convention Naming Sgt. Gloria Lewis Law Enforcement Officer of the Year

 The “Mighty” 20th District, Department of Texas, The American Legion held their annual Spring Convention at Missing Man Post No. 667. 

During the convention, District Commander Eric Mayer of Business and Professional Post No. 2 presented district-level National Security Program Awards.

The Law Enforcement Officer of the Year was presented to Sgt. Gloria Lewis of Bexar County Precinct 4 Constable’s Office.

Lewis, an 18-year-law enforcement officer, was nominated by Fred Brock Post No. 828. 

“I am so proud to have been recognized, especially by Fred Brock Post 828,” said Lewis, a graduate of Wheatley High School in San Antonio and Huston-Tillotson University in Austin, Texas. “We try to do a lot of things here in our community from working with the homeless to mental health.”

Lewis first served with the Bexar County Sheriff’s Office and then with the Constable’s Office where she was promoted to the rank of corporal then sergeant. She currently supervises 20 deputies. 

Constable Kat Brown Speaks on Sgt. Lewis’ Impact

Joining Lewis at the presentation was Precinct 4 Constable Kathryn Brown.

“I’ve had the pleasure of serving alongside Sgt. Lewis for 18 years during our time with the Bexar County Sheriff’s Office—first as fellow deputies, and now in my current role as an elected Constable,” said Brown. “It was an honor to promote Sgt. Lewis to her current rank and to submit her name for this award, a decision based on her integrity, accountability, leadership qualities, and deep passion for public service.” 

A Historic First for Bexar County Law Enforcement

According to Brown, this marks the first time Lewis has been formally recognized for her contributions in law enforcement. Even more significant, she is the first African-American female deputy constable to hold the rank of sergeant in Bexar County history.

Recognizing Local Heroes Across Public Safety Sectors

Other district awardees included: 

Firefighter of Year: Joshua Smith

Firefighter of Year: Zachary Moore (2024) 

Emergency Medical Technician of the Year: Cory Ramon

National Guard/Reservist of the Year: Staff Sgt. Lindsey Neubauer

Additionally, Mayer recognized dedicated members of district to include Legionnaire Pamela Oliver-Shepheard of Fred Brock Post No. 828 as the 20th District Legionnaire of the Year. 

Story by: Burrell Parmer, Post No. 828

Summer Stamp Hike: Will We Soon Pay a Dollar to Mail a Letter?

Get Ready to Dig a Little Deeper the Next Time You Send a Card or Letter—because Stamps Might Be Going Up Again This Summer

The United States Postal Service (USPS) is asking to raise the price of a first-class “forever” stamp by five cents—from 73 to 78 cents. If approved, this change would kick in on July 13 and bump up the price of other mailing services too, like postcards, metered mail, and international letters—about a 7.4% increase overall.

If you’re thinking “Didn’t stamps just go up?”—you’re not wrong. The USPS has been steadily increasing rates over the past few years in a push to stay financially afloat. Former Postmaster General Louis DeJoy had warned the public that more hikes were coming, calling past pricing models “defective.”

Now, here we are—one step closer to seeing a single stamp cost nearly a full dollar. Think about that for a second: did you ever imagine you’d be alive to see mailing a letter cost close to $1?

DeJoy, who resigned this past March, had been a big part of these rate adjustments. Meanwhile, talks within the Trump administration and Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) have raised questions about the future of the USPS—everything from leadership changes to talk of privatization and moving the Postal Service under the Commerce Department.

Deputy Postmaster General Doug Tulino is currently filling in while the search for a permanent replacement is underway.

But for now, if you’re a fan of snail mail, stock up on those forever stamps while they’re still 73 cents. Because come July, mailing a birthday card might just cost you a bit more than you expected.

Bridge Builder Mentee Earns Spot in Prestigious UTSA STEM Program

Jeffrey L. August, founder of the J.L. August Bridge Builder Mentoring Program, is celebrating one of his bright mentees—and for good reason.

Jason Ogunlana, a 7th-grade student at the Young Men’s Leadership Academy and two-year mentee in the Bridge Builder program, has been awarded a full tuition scholarship to attend the University of Texas at San Antonio’s prestigious PREP (Pre-Freshman Engineering Program) this summer.

Jeffrey L. August, founder of the J.L. August Bridge Builder Mentoring Program, is celebrating one of his bright mentees—and for good reason.
Jeffrey L. August, founder of the J.L. August Bridge Builder Mentoring Program, is celebrating one of his bright mentees—and for good reason.

Jason is one of four standout middle school students selected for this opportunity, joining Ersan Yutman, Benjamin Lopez, and Ihtisham Nouman. The UTSA PREP program is known for being competitive and rigorous, focusing on preparing students for future success in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics). Students will engage in college-level coursework, hands-on learning, and collaborative projects alongside other high-achieving peers from across the region.

The Bridge Builder program is designed to uplift and guide young men through mentorship, leadership development, and educational support. Jason’s achievement is a powerful reflection of the program’s impact—and a glimpse of his promising future.

The San Antonio ISD community joins in congratulating all four scholars for earning a spot in one of UTSA’s most respected academic initiatives.

Trump Spares Electronics From Tariffs

Wall Street Cheers, Silicon Valley Workers Fear As Trump Backs Off Tariffs & Big Tech Cashes In

In a dramatic policy reversal, the Trump administration announced late Friday it would exempt smartphones, laptops, and other consumer electronics from sweeping tariffs—sidestepping what could’ve been a pricing disaster for both tech companies and consumers. Devices like iPhones, hard drives, chips, and flat-panel monitors won’t be subject to the 145% tariffs on Chinese goods or the 10% baseline for other countries, per U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

The decision immediately sent ripples through the market, with analysts predicting a rally led by Apple and Nvidia when the U.S. stock market reopens Monday. Apple, which still manufactures its flagship devices in China, was seen as particularly vulnerable. “A huge black cloud has been lifted off the tech sector,” said Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.

Why the White House Flinched on Tariffs

Behind the scenes, the exemption underscores the administration’s quiet recognition that its trade war tactics aren’t moving the needle on domestic tech manufacturing. Apple’s decades-deep supply chain in China isn’t something that can be uprooted overnight—or even over a few years—without massive cost increases that would make iPhones triple in price and tank sales. A U.S.-based production shift may be a political talking point, but in reality, it’s a logistical fantasy in the short term.

That’s why, for the second time during Trump’s presidency, electronics got a hall pass. But this time around, it followed a steep tumble in tech stock value, with the so-called “Magnificent Seven”—Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Tesla, Alphabet, and Meta—losing $2.1 trillion combined in value after the new tariffs were first unveiled on April 2. Though some of those losses eased after a partial pause earlier this week, Friday’s exemption signals a full retreat on electronics—at least for now.

Tech Executives Cozy Up as Workers Brace for Impact

This tariff reprieve is exactly the kind of treatment Big Tech had been banking on when leaders like Tim Cook, Elon Musk, Sundar Pichai, Mark Zuckerberg, and Jeff Bezos stood behind Trump during his January 20 inauguration. Their public show of loyalty was a strategic move—betting that the new administration would be more accommodating than Biden’s.

That bet appears to be paying off. Apple recently pledged $500 billion in U.S. investments and 20,000 jobs, echoing its earlier $350 billion promise during Trump’s first term when iPhones were also granted tariff exemptions.

But while the boardrooms may be celebrating, the mood on the ground in Silicon Valley tells a very different story.

A Growing Divide Between Tech Leaders and Their Workforce

As tech billionaires shift further to the right—funding campaigns, filling White House roles, and adopting authoritarian rhetoric—many of their employees are feeling betrayed, fearful, and politically disconnected. “The trust is broken,” said Kamal Ali, an AI developer. “A lot of employees are very upset by what’s going on. It’s going to be different forever.”

The ideological divide between tech executives and their workforces is growing. While Trump fills advisory roles with venture capitalists and crypto tycoons, everyday tech workers are protesting his agenda. Thousands showed up at rallies across Silicon Valley last weekend, including a packed demonstration in downtown San Jose. The fear wasn’t just about politics—it was about power, surveillance, and the erosion of democracy.

“Just coming here, everyone’s saying turn off the facial recognition on your phone,” said Dianne Wood, a startup employee. “We’re all scared.”

Silicon Valley’s Identity Crisis

The tech industry used to pride itself on progress—startups that wanted to “change the world” and companies that branded themselves as ethical disruptors. But the rise of crypto, AI, and billion-dollar egos has turned that mission inward. “Now, if you’re part of a startup, you’re hoping you’ll be absorbed in a way that’s profitable,” said Jan English-Lueck, a San Jose State professor who has tracked the culture of Silicon Valley for over two decades.

That cultural shift, combined with layoffs, surveillance concerns, and growing inequality, has left workers disillusioned. “The money is all shifting to the wealthiest, and that terrifies me,” Wood said. “Unfortunately, you’ve got the Zuckerbergs and Elon Musks of the world who are taking that over.”

What It Means for the Future of Tech

For everyday people, the tariff reversal means no immediate spike in smartphone or laptop prices. But for the industry’s workforce, it’s a red flag. The Trump administration’s public courting of tech giants—even while hinting at pressure for onshore manufacturing—raises serious questions about who benefits from this “new era” of tech policy.

This isn’t just a shift in trade—it’s a shift in power, in politics, and in who gets a say in shaping the future. While Wall Street may cheer Monday’s rebound, Silicon Valley’s workers are left wondering: at what cost?

‘Pop the Balloon LIVE’ Popped It’s Own Balloon

YouTube Favorite Turned Streaming Flop? Fans Slam Netflix for Ruining the Show’s Charm

Netflix’s Pop the Balloon LIVE! made its big debut—but instead of exploding onto the scene, it kind of just…popped. Fans of the original YouTube series were already wary when Arlette Amuli, the show’s beloved creator and host, wasn’t at the helm. In her place stood Yvonne Orji, a talented comedian, but a switch that left many wondering: why fix what wasn’t broken?

Orji did her best, but the vibe felt off. The live element added chaos, not charm. Instead of the organic awkwardness and hilarious vulnerability that made the YouTube series a hit, we got something that felt overly produced, crowded with reality TV energy and Instagram-filtered personalities. The result? A show trying to go mainstream but losing the very authenticity that made it matter.

Reality TV Vibes Replaced Real People

The original Pop the Balloon had magic because it was full of normal, regular people with crooked teeth, awkward charm, and zero Hollywood polish. They were out here looking for love, not a casting call. But the Netflix version? Half the lineup had reality show résumés. Gone were the relatable fits and nervous daters. In came the clout-chasers with veneers and media training.

And while there were still some shining moments—Engineer Guy in the orange silk shirt stole hearts and gave us the wholesome chaos we signed up for—the cast overall felt like they were performing, not connecting. Viewers noticed, and they weren’t subtle about their disappointment.

A Not-So-Subtle Whitewash?

The shift wasn’t just about tone. Fans quickly picked up on the reduced presence of Black singles—a stark departure from the original’s unofficial Black dating show energy. Only two Black women were in the lineup. Two out of five male suitors were Black. Even if it wasn’t intentional, it felt like a whitewashed rebranding made for Netflix palatability.

And the awkward racial moments? They piled up fast. One white woman flirted with Bananas by declaring, “My type is Black,” to which he replied, “I’m Black from the waist down.” Another blonde contestant rapped and twerked while claiming she grew up on Chingy in Michigan. Whew. Even Dr. Umar would’ve short-circuited.

When Clout Chases Chemistry

The daters weren’t just different—they were different on purpose. The show leaned heavily into casting folks with camera presence over authentic connection. The audience noticed that this version wasn’t about messy, hilarious romance—it was about lighting, styling, and influencer followings. Even post-round confessionals and live audience reactions felt like distractions from the heart of the show.

The vibe shifted from “cute trainwreck” to “cringe chaos.” Orji, despite her comedy chops, struggled to find rhythm with the cast, often speaking over balloon pops or forcing punchlines that didn’t land.

But Can They Bounce Back?

Despite the growing pains, all hope isn’t lost. The best moments of the premiere episode happened when the noise died down and we got glimpses of the old Pop the Balloon magic. Take the fan-favorite moment: a lanky, lovable Engineer Guy nervously choosing between two women—only to get hit with a ridiculous “I don’t like curry” comment from one right after he said it was his favorite spice. Balloon popped. Audience howled.

It’s these human, off-the-cuff moments that built the show’s cult following. If Netflix wants to avoid total deflation, they’d do well to bring back what worked: real people, real reactions, and less gentrified gloss. The next live episode drops Thursday, and for many fans, it’s a second chance to fix the misstep.

Can the Next Episode Save the Series?

With the next Pop the Balloon LIVE! episode airing this Thursday, there’s still time to course-correct. The response to episode one was loud and clear—and if producers are listening, they might have a shot at redeeming the show in real time.

Fans are hopeful the new episode will bring back the heart, humor, and authenticity that made Pop the Balloon a hit in the first place. Less overproduction, more real people. Less clout-chasing, more chemistry. Because underneath all the mess, the love for the original is still there—Netflix just has to find its way back to it.

“I Shot People Because They Were Black”, TOPS Murderer Wants Fair Trial

Buffalo Mass Shooter Wants Trial Moved to NYC, Citing “Unfair” Local Sentencing

Payton Gendron—the white teenager who murdered 10 Black people at a Tops supermarket in Buffalo in 2022—is asking a federal judge to move his upcoming trial to New York City. He says he won’t get a fair trial in Western New York because of heavy media coverage and the deep emotional impact the shooting had on Buffalo’s Black community.

Gendron already pleaded guilty to state charges in 2022 and is serving life in prison without parole. But he still faces federal hate crime charges, which could bring the death penalty. That trial is set for September.

Payton Gendron, a white teen who killed 10 Black

Now his lawyers say the trial needs to be moved downstate. In court filings, they claim “it is impossible to select an impartial jury in Buffalo due to the overwhelming amount of pretrial publicity” and because of “the impact of this case on Buffalo’s segregated communities of color,” according to ABC News. They’re asking that the trial be moved to the Southern District of New York—which includes Manhattan and the Bronx—where they believe jurors would be more diverse and less affected by local media coverage. Federal prosecutors haven’t responded to the request yet.

Families of the victims are firmly against the idea. Barbara Massey Mapps, whose sister was killed, said, “We don’t want that.” Wayne Jones, who lost his mother in the massacre, added, “I want him to stay here so I can see the trial.”

Jones also said the video Gendron livestreamed during the attack leaves little doubt about his guilt and supports keeping the death penalty on the table.

Gendron has also asked the court to take the death penalty off the table entirely, claiming it’s being applied in a racially biased way. That issue is still pending.

At his 2023 sentencing, Gendron said, “I did a terrible thing that day. I shot people because they were Black,” and apologized to the victims’ families.

Prosecutors say Gendron planned the attack for months, choosing the location because it was in a predominantly Black neighborhood. He drove over three hours, wore body armor, and used a modified AR-15.

From Moors to Malcolm: Resistance

Know Your Important Dates

As a result of the Moorish conquest of Spain skin color became the norm of racist identification. The Moors were Black, or dark-skinned people, who conquered Spain for over 7 centuries. The Moors were defeated in 1492, and unlike ancient slavery bondage based on skin color took hold. Contrary to popular belief the first slaves did not come in 1619. The Portuguese and Spanish had already brought Africans to the Americas as early as 1520. In 1619, Africans were brought to the colony Jamestown, Virginia by the Dutch. The Stono Rebellion was the largest slave revolt ever staged in the 13 colonies. However, on Sunday, Sept. 9, 1739, about 20 slaves under the leadership of a man named Jimmy provided whites with a painful lesson on the African desire for liberty.

Moreover, the German Coast Uprising (1811), was a large revolt of “Woke” slaves in Louisiana. The Haitian Revolution (1791-1804), which was spearheaded by Toussaint Louverture who fought and won freedom, struck fear in the hearts of slave owners everywhere; it struck a loud and electrifying chord with African slaves in America and was a rallying cry for Black soldiers during the Civil War. The British often employed Blacks and did so in the War of 1812. In fact, “The British enlisted Black runaways into a battalion known as the Colonial Marines.” These men became the best troops in the British forces. In 1829, during the Deiz y Seiz celebrations, Afro-Mexican President Vicente Guerrero abolished in Mexico, which included Texas, and is what caused white settlers to rebel against Mexico and the real reason for the Battle of the Alamo and San Jacinto. As early as January of 1836, free Blacks were ordered out of Texas unless sponsored by a white man, were light-skinned Mulattos that had Black slaves, or unless authorized by the Texas Congress. The free black presence in Texas would be completely eliminated when Mexico was defeated.

Between August 21–22, 1831, was the Nat Turner Revolt. Turner-killed 60 slave owners in Virginia in 1831. Historians refer to Turner as the Spartacus of his time. In the Dred Scott Case (1857), the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is quoted as saying,

On October 16, 1859. John Brown’s Raid at Harpers Ferry, which is the real reason for the start of the Civil War (1861). On February 12, 1909, the NAACP founded, and on May 17, 1954: the Supreme Court rules 9-0 in Brown v. Board of Education that school segregation is unconstitutional. On February 1, 1960, SNCC (The Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee) was founded and was the most radical in providing advice to Martin Luther King’s movement.

On August 23,1963: Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. delivered his famous “I have a dream” speech at the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom and on February 21, 1965 Malcolm X was assassinated. Malcolm’s ideas would continue with the founding, on October 15, 1966, in Oakland, CA, of the Black Panther Party for self Defense which was founded by Huey Newton and Bobby Seale. In an attempt to destroy the freedom movement on April 4, 1968, MLK was assassinated. On June 7,1998, James Byrd Jr. was dragged to death in Jasper, Texas, and on November 4, 2008, Barack Obama was elected the 44th President of the United States, and the first Black President of the United States. There are many more important dates and all of them show that Black resistance to white supremacy cannot be destroyed.

SAVE Act Would Tighten Voter Registration Rules

Challenges To The Right To Vote

Elections, and the rules by which they are conducted, are continuing to dominate the news cycles, whether in print, broadcast or social media platforms.

With a plethora of organizations that are dedicated to resisting the “conservative agenda”, designed to takeover our democracy, it’s become evident how some of the richest donors have been engaged in hiding their influence, via political action committees, donating minimum amounts to individual candidates and their campaigns and attempting to buy votes, particularly in judicial elections.

Vote For Trump, Get a Million Bucks

Most recently, Elon Musk (the unelected czar of DOGE), made offers of millions of dollars, to Wisconsin voters, if they agreed to sign a petition and to vote for the Trump backed candidate, for the state Supreme Court. Results show their candidate list. This illustrates how ultra wealth is “being weaponized to drown out our ordinary voices and hijack the political process.” It also suggests that if one has enough money, the rules don’t apply and elections become just another thing the rich can buy!

Supreme Courts Disastrous Ruling

Thanks to the Supreme Courts disastrous Citizen’s United ruling, the ultra rich and billionaires, have been handed a blank check, to control our democracy. Even so, some legal lines still exist, and Musk may have just openly and defiantly crossed one.

In his attempt to influence the outcome of the election, his conduct appears to directly violate federal law, which bans offering money or anything of value, in exchange for votes. This scheme, if left unchecked, is a blueprint for how billionaires can convert their wealth into political power, leaving ordinary citizens like us, with no voice at all.

With the House’s passing of the SAVE Act, it has become obvious, to many observers, that citizens are going to need to register in person to vote or update any personal information.

SAVE Act Would Tighten Voter Registration Rules

Under the proposed SAVE Act, all voters registering or updating their registration would be required to appear in person at an election office.
Individuals must present original or certified documents proving both identity and U.S. citizenship.
For most Americans, that means bringing a passport or birth certificate.
Everyday updates like moving, changing your name (including already married women), or switching party affiliation would also require in-person visits with these documents.
The rule could affect millions who typically update their voter information multiple times throughout their lives.

Although the SAVE ACT, is headed to the Senate, observers already say, it will face an uphill battle there to get 60 votes in order for the bill to be one law!

The proof of citizenship requirement is subject to disenfranchisement of a variety of voters. In the case of the President’s Executive Order regarding new machines and the cancelling of some mail-in ballots, the midterm elections could be very challenging and too close to call.

The Executive Order mandates that ballots received after Election Day will not be counted.

We’re continuing to evaluate just how much our participation could suffer.